Conduct a product naming workshop
You are launching something and the team has been arguing over names in a Slack thread for three weeks. This runs a single 90-minute workshop — constraints, generation, stress tests, decision — that produces a final shortlist of 3 names with the rationale to defend whichever one ships.
Naming Workshops That End in 90 Minutes, Not 3 Weeks
Naming debates drag on because they mix three different decisions — what category the name should be, what it should feel like, and which specific candidate to pick — and teams never separate them. A structured workshop forces the category decision first, then surfaces candidates within the chosen category, then stress-tests the top 10 before shortlisting. Done in one session, the debate ends and the trademark check starts.
How the Conduct a product naming workshop Prompt Works
The prompt runs a 90-minute structured session: 10 minutes to align on hard constraints (trademark, domain, international, brand architecture), 10 minutes to pick 1-2 naming categories (descriptive vs. invented vs. metaphor vs. founder/place), 20 minutes of silent-generation first to prevent groupthink, 30 minutes of stress tests (hallway test, email test, pluralization, rival test), and 20 minutes to shortlist and rank.
The hallway test — would you be embarrassed to say it out loud — is the single most predictive check for consumer names, and the one most teams skip. The rival test — saying the candidate next to a competitor's name — reveals whether the name stands out or blends into the category.
When to Use It
- A launch is <4 weeks out and the team is still debating names.
- A new product line needs a name that fits the parent brand architecture.
- A rebrand or repositioning requires a fresh name under constraint.
- A trademark concern is forcing a rename and you need candidates fast.
- A founding team is naming v1 and wants to avoid three more weeks of Slack threads.
Common Pitfalls
- Generating before agreeing on category. Descriptive and invented names optimize for different things; mixing them produces incomparable candidates.
- Skipping the hallway test. Names that look fine in slide decks fail when people have to say them out loud in meetings.
- Picking before trademark. The top candidate is only the top candidate if it survives trademark check. Always hold a backup.
Sources
- Mind the Product — on product branding and positioning
- First Round Review — on company and product naming
- Stripe Press — on long-view company building
- Good Product Team / Bad Product Team — Silicon Valley Product Group
Sources
- Mind the Product — Mind the Product
- First Round Review — First Round
- Stripe Press — Stripe Press
- Good Product Team / Bad Product Team — Silicon Valley Product Group
Prompt details
Ready to try the prompt?
Open the live prompt detail page for the full workflow.